东海中、北部及黄海南部海域底层渔业生物多样性时空分布特征
作者:
作者单位:

农业部东海与远洋渔业资源开发利用重点实验室,农业部东海与远洋渔业资源开发利用重点实验室

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

农业部专项东海区海洋捕捞基础信息动态采集分析(2011-2015);农业部专项中日暂定水域渔业资源调查(2011-2015);公益性行业(农业)科研专项


Temporal and spatial distribution of bottom fishery biodiversity in the middle and north of the East China Sea and the south of the Yellow Sea
Author:
Affiliation:

Key Laboratory of East China Sea Oceanic Fishery Resources Exploitation and Utilization,Ministry of Agriculture,P.R.China,East China Sea Fisheries Institute,Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences,Key Laboratory of East China Sea Oceanic Fishery Resources Exploitation and Utilization,Ministry of Agriculture,P.R.China,East China Sea Fisheries Institute,Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为研究和认识渔业生物群落结构和海洋生态系统在时间和空间上的变化特征和规律,实验依据2000年4个季度大面积定点底拖网的调查数据,利用海洋生态学研究常用的多样性指数,采用聚类的分析方法和空间投射的图示方法,对东海中、北部及黄海南部海域底层渔业生物多样性季节间的分布变化特征和规律进行了归纳,探讨了生物数量和重量季节变化不统一的可能原因,并分析了多样性与生物重量和数量之间的联系。结果显示,各季站点均可分成多样性水平高、中、低3个类群,各类群呈点、线和块状分布,且呈现中心、夹层和外层分别由高、中、低多样性类群构成的“三明治”结构或组合。各季“三明治”结构分布可能与渔业资源的生理周期洄游活动相关,结构中心水域可能对应多数渔业生物洄游活动主要范围。各季均出现高、低多样性类群直接相联、多样性呈现空间上跳跃性变化的水域,这些水域的资源生物量普遍相对较低,但一般都是毗邻生物量相对较高水域,其分布范围与毗邻相对高生物量水域的绝对生物量水平呈负向关系。春、冬季各类群对应生物平均重量和数量等级一致,而夏、秋季则不一致,这可能与各季渔业生物产卵、生长、补充等不同生命周期过程相关。不管重量还是尾数,多样性指数随生物量增加而下降的情形均多于增加的情形;多样性指数随生物尾数增加的正向关系明显高于与生物重量之间的正向关系。

    Abstract:

    The structural composition of an ecosystem or biological community will change as a result of changes in the external environment, or the change in the manner of conversion between internal matter and energy. According to the study of the structure composition of ecosystem or biological community, this association can be used to analyze the internal and external state. The diversity index is a simple and feasible method to describe the composition of the ecosystem or biological community, and has been widely used in ecology. In order to study and understand the structure changes of fishery community structure and marine ecosystem in time and space, this paper, based on the survey data of four-quarter fixed-point bottom trawl in 2000, using the Shannon-Wiener, Margalef and Pielou indices which were commonly used in marine ecology researches, adopted the clustering analysis method and the spatial projection method to describe and summarize the distribution and variation of seasonal fishery biodiversity in the middle and north of the East China Sea and the southern part of the Yellow Sea, and discussed the possible causes of seasonal variation in the number and weight of organisms, and analyzed the association between diversity and biomass weight and quantity. The results showed that the sites in each season could be divided into three groups with high, middle and low diversity. The distribution of each group was in the shape of point, line and block. The combination of groups is analogous to a “sandwich” structure with the center, interlayer and outer layer corresponding to high, medium and low diversity. The distribution of the “sandwich” structure in each season may be related to the physiological cycle migration of fishery resources. The center waters of the structure may correspond to the main range of most fishery biological migration. For example, the centers of four “sandwich” structures in spring correspond to the spawning grounds for Pseudosciaena polyactis, Larimichthys crocea, Pampus argenteus, Setipinna taty, Thamnaconus septemtrionalis, Scomber japonicus, Auxis rochei, etc.. The center of “sandwich” structures in summer, autumn and winter may correspond to the main feeding, fostering and overwintering grounds of fishery organisms. There were waters in all seasons with high and low diversity groups connected directly, and the diversities showed the spatially skipped-changing. The resource biomass of these waters was generally relatively low. In the waters with low total resources, species diversity will be high when the species is relatively balanced, and once a species of biomass is slightly increased it may lead to drastic fluctuations in diversity. It was also found that these waters are generally adjacent to the relatively high biomass waters, and the range of the waters was negatively related to the absolute biomass of the relative high biomass waters. It might be related to the aggregation degree of some dominant species. The dominant species with higher biomass had higher aggregation degree, and the aggregation range and influence were relatively small. The smaller the influence sphere of the dominant species, the smaller the range of fluctuation of the diversity of the surrounding low-biomass samples. On the contrary, the dominant species with low aggregation degree, but its influence sphere is relatively large, and the range of fluctuation of the diversity of the surrounding low-biomass samples is large. The average weight and number of species in spring and winter are consistent, but not in summer and autumn. This may be related to different life cycle processes such as spawning, growth and recruitment. The fish body of the main fishery resources in each season is a relative standard, and number of relatively large or small individuals is relatively few. Non-standard body size only occurs in the summer and autumn, which might be due to the gradual increasing of the recruitment of fishing populations. A relatively small number of recruitment comes from some earlier spawning groups in summer, while main of the recruitment of the year comes in the fall. As a result of recruiting, the lean body appears in the highly diverse groups of summer and autumn. The overweight body in the middle and high diversity groups of summer might be because of the non-spawning broodstocks, whose body was always fat to ensure the next generation with enough nutrition. They also might include a small number of delayed spawning, or skipped-spawning fish in the stage of self-absorption, which were always with fat body. Regardless of weight or mantissa, the cases that diversity index decreased with the increase of biomass were more than the cases that diversity index increased with the increase of biomass. Most of the increase in biomass was not because of the increase in the number of species, but was likely to be due to the increase of biomass of very few dominant species, resulting in a decrease in the homogeneity of species and a decline in biodiversity. The positive association of diversity indices with mantissa was significantly higher than the positive relationship with weight, probably due to the increase in the number of organisms in most cases were due to the increase in the number of species resulting in higher diversity, while the increase of weight was mostly because the dominant species continued to expand, leading to the decrease of diversity.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘勇,程家骅.东海中、北部及黄海南部海域底层渔业生物多样性时空分布特征[J].水产学报,2017,41(8):1223~1236

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-25
  • 最后修改日期:2016-09-27
  • 录用日期:2016-11-15
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-08-20
  • 出版日期: