Shannon-Wiener多样性指数两种计算方法的比较研究
作者:
作者单位:

中国海洋大学,弗吉尼亚理工大学,中国海洋大学 水产学院,中国海洋大学 水产学院,中国海洋大学 水产学院,中国海洋大学 水产学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

海洋公益性行业科研专项(201305030);公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201303050)


Comparative study on two computing methods for estimating Shannon-Wiener diversity index
Author:
Affiliation:

Ocean University of China,Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,,,,College of Fisheries, Ocean University of China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在应用群落多样性指数评价调查海域群落物种多样性或进行海域生态环境评价时,常用基于样方数据(方法1)或基于区域混合样数据(方法2)2种方法计算Shannon-Wiener多样性指数。为了比较哪种方法所得结果能更好地反映调查海域群落多样性状况,并且分析多样性指数与样本含量的关系,本实验根据2009年胶州湾潮滩湿地大型底栖动物季度调查数据,应用再抽样模拟方法对2种多样性指数计算方法进行了比较研究。结果表明,对于相同样本含量,基于样方数据计算的Shannon-Wiener多样性指数值小于基于区域混合样数据计算的结果。方法1所计算的群落多样性指数与样本含量无关;而方法2计算的多样性指数值随样本含量的增加而增加,并在样本含量为20时接近“真值”并趋于稳定,其相对估计误差(REE)和相对偏差(RB)较小,表明样本含量影响方法2的多样性指数的计算。在评价调查海域群落物种多样性或进行海域生态环境评价时,应该使用基于区域混合样数据的计算方法,并保证足够的样本含量,才能客观地反映海域群落生物多样性现状。

    Abstract:

    Shannon-Wiener diversity index is commonly used in measuring the community species diversity or assessing the ecological status of marine environments.There are two methods to compute the Shannon-Wiener diversity index in the surveyed region,which is calculated based on each sample data(Method 1) or based on the pooled data of the survey region(Method 2).In order to find out which method is better to reflect the species diversity of the survey region,as well as to examine the relationship between the Shannon-Wiener diversity index and the sample size,a comparative study of these two methods was carried out using simulation study based on the data from the macrozoobenthos survey in tidal flat wetland of northwestern Jiaozhou Bay in 2009.The results showed that the Shannon-Wiener diversity index calculated by Method 1 was lower than that from Method 2.The estimated Shannon-Wiener diversity index calculated by Method 1 was independent of sample size,and the Shannon-Wiener diversity index by Method 2 became greater with the sample size increasing,and then kept stable approaching the “true value” at the sample size of 20.Both the relative estimation error (REE) and the relative bias (RB) of the diversity index estimation from Method 2 were getting smaller when the sample size was greater than 20,which indicated that the sample size affected the calculating results of Method 2.Method 2 with enough or optimal sample size would be used in estimating the species diversity or in evaluating the ecological quality of the entire survey area,which would objectively reflect the status of species diversity in the survey area.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王晶,焦燕,任一平,薛莹,纪毓鹏,徐宾铎. Shannon-Wiener多样性指数两种计算方法的比较研究[J].水产学报,2015,39(8):1257~1263

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-18
  • 最后修改日期:2015-06-22
  • 录用日期:2015-08-26
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-08-26
  • 出版日期: